Aquí vemos unos
párrafos de Protocols
of the Learned Elders of Zion. El relato es asombroso y
no deja de parecerse al del Príncipe
de Maquiavelo, por sus consejos sobre
cómo gobernar y sojuzgar a las masas, o sea a nosotros. El siguiente es el Protocolo 1 y es totalmente recomendable
de leer. En vocabulario: slackened, goyim y otras.
La libertad política es una idea, no una realidad…
… el poder que ha reemplazado al de los gobernantes
es el del oro…
… la política no tiene nada en común con la moral…
… el que quiere gobernar debe recurrir a la astucia
y a la mentira…
Political
freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary
with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one´s party
for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered
easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom,
so-called liberalism, and for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of
his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened
reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered
together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one
single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the
place of the old already weakened by liberalism.
 |
| Great within the Small, Sergei Nilus |
In our day
the power which has replaced that of the rulers who were liberal is the power
of Gold. Time was when
Faith ruled. The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one
knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to
self-government for a certain length of time for that people to be turned into
a disorganized mob. From that moment on we get internecine strife which
soon develops into battles between classes, in the midst of which States burn
down and their importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes.
When a State
exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discords brings it
under the power of external foes, in any case it can be accounted irretrievably
lost; it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our
hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take
hold of: if not, it goes to the bottom.
Should anyone of
a liberal mind say that such reflections as the above are immoral I would put
the following questions: if every State has two foes and if in regard to the
external foes it is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and
art of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of
attack and defense, to attack him by night or in superior numbers, then in what
way can the same means in regards to a worse foe, the destroyer of the
structure of society and the commonweal be called immoral and not
permissible?...
… The
political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed
by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable in his
throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make
believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and politics, are
vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more
effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities
must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim but we must in no
wise by guided by them.
Our right lies
in force. The word “right” is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The
word means no more than: give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a
proof that I am stronger than you.
Where does right
begin? Where does it end?
In any State in
which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of
the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever
multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right-to attack by the right of the
strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and
regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of
those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down
voluntarily in their liberalism.
Our power in the
present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more
invincible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment
when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.
Out of the
temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an
unshakeable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the
national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the
means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to
what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.
Before us is a
plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate
without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to
naught.
In order to
elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard for the
rascality, the slackness, the instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to
understand and respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. It
must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless and unreasoning
force ever at a mercy of a suggestion from any side. The blind cannot lead the
blind without bringing them to the abyss; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts
from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having
no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob
without bringing the whole nation to ruin.
Only one trained
from childhood for independent rule can have understanding of the words that
can be made up of the political alphabet.
A people left to
itself, i.e., to upstarts from its midst, brings itself to ruin by party
dissentions excited by the pursuit of power and honors and the disorders
arising therefrom. It is possible for the masses of the people calmly and
without petty jealousies to form judgments, to deal with the affairs of the
country, which cannot be mixed up… (Transcription up to page 14)
Vocabulario
slacken: relax, loosen, weaken.
An internecine
conflict is one which takes place between opposing groups within a country.
The whole
episode has drawn attention again to internecine strife in the ruling
party.
willy-nilly: whether one wishes it or not
Goy ( regular plural goyim) is the standard Hebrew biblical term for a nation. Long
before Roman times it had also
acquired the meaning of someone who is not Jewish.
totter: be unstable.
upstart: social climber, nobody.
Artículos relacionados
… is a
fabricated anti-Semitic text purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination… The
Protocols
… The first prophecy
was the decline of the great kingdoms that existed at that time… Muhammad
Gala
Anti-Semitism in Russia
had always been an important part in this… Against
the Protocols
This task is
rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea
of freedom… The Protocols
No comments:
Post a Comment